|
||||||
|
Field Sobriety Tests There are five types of drunk driving evidence 1. Incriminating statements ("Officer, I only had a couple of drinks") There are over a dozen different field sobriety tests that have been used by officers to various extents. Known to most officers and lawyers as “FSTs,” these tests are basically a series of exercises created to test coordination, balance, and divided attention (an individuals capability to perform two actions simultaneously). The most popular FSTs are walk-and-turn, one-leg-stand, hand-pat, finger-to-nose, fingers to thumb, nystagmus (watching an object moving only your eyes), and alphabet recitation. One thing to know, these tests have been scientifically disputed numerous times. Field sobriety tests can often even be difficult for a sober individual to perform. Also, to “pass” the test is to be determined by the officer’s better judgment. One thing the popular public does not seem to know: These tests are not legally mandatory. Besides possibly irritating the officer, an individual may opt not to take a test without any legal consequence. Continuing the scientific research, funded by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, studies have shown that just three of the numerous FSTs are actually successful in determining a drunk driver. These tests are nystagmus, walk-and-turn, and the one-leg-stand. Basically, this discovery deems all other field sobriety tests completely unreliable. Taking action with this study, law enforcement agencies around the country have created a suggested “standardized” battery of these three tests. In California though, the law enforcement agencies have, for the most part, ignored the standardized field sobriety tests. Most, in fact, continue to utilize whichever test they prefer. Accuracy of Field Sobriety Tests Officer's Pocketbook to DUI Driving Indicators The Eye Test Field Sobriety Tests
|
Copyright 2001 - 2008 |
|||||
|
|
||||||